ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Accuracy of Distal Internal Carotid Artery Contrast Ratio to Infer Proximal Carotid Disease in the Mobile Stroke Unit.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is a common cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Cervical computed tomography (CT) angiography can rapidly diagnose carotid pathology but is not possible with current-generation CT scanners used in mobile stroke units. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the intracranial ICA contrast density ratio (CDR) to identify extracranial ICA stenosis.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients at 3 comprehensive stroke centers in Melbourne, Victoria, who received CT angiography on the mobile stroke unit CereTom CT scanner, with reference standard in-hospital CT angiography or digital subtraction angiography in the Melbourne mobile stroke unit database. The mean Hounsfield units at 4 segments of the intracranial ICA, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the symptomatic hemisphere, were measured. The CDR was calculated using the formula: CDR=contralateral mean Hounsfield units/ipsilateral Hounsfield units. Statistical analysis was completed with univariate analysis of CDR, and leave-one-out cross-validation with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve to determine CDR thresholds associated with stenosis or occlusion, to determine sensitivity and specificity of the test.
resultsOf 151 patients included, 31 of 151 (20.5%) had extracranial ICA stenosis >50%, and the average CDR was higher in patients with >70% stenosis with threshold ratio of >1.24 (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 88%; positive predictive value, 57%; and negative predictive value, 96%) or extracranial occlusion (sensitivity, 100; specificity, 82%; positive predictive value, 29%; and negative predictive value, 100%). The threshold of 1.18 for 50% to 99% and carotid occlusion had lower sensitivity (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 95%; positive predictive value, 88%; and negative predictive value, 91%).
conclusionsAssessment of the intracranial ICA CDR may assist in ruling out high-grade extracranial stenosis in patients who are being considered for direct transfer for endovascular thrombectomy after head-only CT angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.