ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Initial Experience With a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting Posterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion on Noncontrast Computed Tomography.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetection of large vessel occlusions using a deep learning (DL) algorithm for the anterior circulation has shown promising results. However, the role of DL algorithms in detecting posterior circulation large vessel occlusion (PC-LVO) remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a DL algorithm (Methinks PC-LVO) for detecting PC-LVO using noncontrast computed tomography.
methodsThis is a retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study that included patients with PC-LVO who underwent both noncontrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiography. The diagnostic performance of the DL algorithm was assessed by analyzing sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for PC-LVO detection of consecutive PC-LVO strokes. For comparative analysis, the area under the curve of the DL algorithm was also evaluated against the performance of a neuroradiologist interpreting noncontrast computed tomography. Ground truth labels were established through consensus readings by expert neuroradiologists. Subgroup analyses were performed according to clot location (proximal posterior cerebral artery and basilar artery) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (NIHSS score ≥6, NIHSS score ≥8, and NIHSS score ≥10).
resultsA total of 196 patients were included, of whom 74 patients had PC-LVO. Among these, 43 had basilar artery occlusions, and 34 had proximal posterior cerebral artery occlusions. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the software were 55.4% and 80.9%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.72. The neuroradiologist achieved a sensitivity of 27.4% and specificity of 91.8%. Among patients with proximal posterior cerebral artery occlusion, sensitivity was 55.9%, whereas for basilar artery occlusion, it was 53.5%. When stratified by NIHSS score ≥10, sensitivity in the proximal posterior cerebral artery was 56.2%, and for the basilar artery with NIHSS score ≥10, it increased to 61.5%.
conclusionsOur initial experience with a DL algorithm for the detection of PC-LVO showed promising results. However, further improvements are required before the algorithm can be implemented in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.