ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Comparative analysis of treatment outcomes and risk factors associated with different combination antimicrobial regimens in patients with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multidrug-resistant Objective: To compare the efficacy of different antibacterial regimens in MDRAB pneumonia and determine independent risk factors for 28-day all-cause mortality. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 142 MDRAB pneumonia patients from February 2022 to February 2025. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A, sulbactam-containing combinations (n = 63); Group B, polymyxins + tigecycline (n = 45); Group C, other regimens (n = 34). Outcomes included bacterial resistance patterns, 28-day mortality, dynamic PCT and CRP levels, APACHE II and SOFA scores, and lymphocyte subsets. Multivariate logistic regression identified mortality predictors. Results: Group A showed the lowest resistance to cefoperazone/sulbactam (30.16%) and the highest sensitivity (71.43%, both P< 0.05). Group B had the highest tigecycline resistance (31.11%). The 28-day mortality rates were 39.68% (A), 60.00% (B), and 64.71% (C) (P = 0.028). Independent mortality predictors were APACHE II, SOFA, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio (all P< 0.01). On day 7, Group A had the lowest PCT, while Group C showed the smallest declines in PCT and CRP. Group A exhibited the highest CD4+/CD8+ ratio. Conclusion: Sulbactam-based combination therapy was associated with improved pathogen clearance and survival in this retrospective cohort. Mortality is closely linked to initial disease severity and early organ dysfunction. Dynamic changes in PCT and CD4+/CD8+ ratio have significant prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.