Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404641›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2026

Long-term changes in breast density reporting after implementation of BI-RADS 5

Brielle Marie Paolini, Ian Smith, Rebecca Leddy, Abbie Cluver, Frank Vento, Madelene C Lewis, Heather R Collins, Abid Irshad

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brielle Marie PaoliniDepartments of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.
Ian SmithDepartments of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.
Rebecca LeddyDepartments of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.
Abbie CluverDepartments of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.
Frank VentoDepartments of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.
Madelene C LewisDepartments of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.
Heather R CollinsDepartments of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-766X
Abid IrshadDepartments of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study are to investigate if there is a long-term change in density assessment between the 4 Material and Methods: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant, single institution study where mammographic density data were obtained for 4 years before the BI-RADS 5 Results: After implementation of the 5 Conclusion: This large single-institution analysis demonstrates that the adoption of the BI-RADS 5

Indexed as

Breast densityBreast imaging reporting and data systemMammography

Identifiers

PMID42404641
PMCPMC13331160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.