Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404604›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2026

Orbital metastasis from breast carcinoma: structured literature review and report of four cases.

Christian Kim, Mica Bergman, Roxana Fu, Caroline Vargason, Michael A Burnstine

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Mica BergmanSamsun Clinic, Santa Barbara, CA, United States.
Roxana FuDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University (NYU) Langone Health's, New York, NY, United States.
Caroline VargasonNAVA Face and Eye, Nampa, ID, United States.
Michael A BurnstineDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California (USC) Roski Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Breast carcinoma is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and represents the most common primary tumor metastasizing to the orbit. Herein, we present the largest review of the clinical features of orbital metastases from breast carcinoma reported in the literature and describe four additional patients. Methods: Case reports and case series of biopsy-proven orbital metastases from breast carcinoma published between 2011 and 2025 were identified through a MEDLINE search. Of 220 records screened, 63 articles (29%) met inclusion criteria. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed for eligibility. Data extracted included patient demographics, tumor subtype and receptor status, timing of breast cancer diagnosis relative to orbital presentation, clinical features, imaging findings, treatments, and survival outcomes. Results: Sixty-nine cases of breast carcinoma metastatic to the orbit from 63 articles were reviewed. The majority of patients were female (66 of 69, 96%). The average age at presentation of orbital symptoms was 60 years. Orbital metastasis was the presenting manifestation of breast cancer in 30/69 patients (43%). In 15 of 69 patients (22%), orbital metastasis was initially diagnosed as a different orbital process. Among the 49 patients for whom primary tumor type was reported, 25 of 49 (51%) had lobular carcinoma and 21 of 49 (43%) had ductal carcinoma. Two patients had independent lobular and ductal primaries, and one patient had a phyllodes tumor. The most common presenting orbital signs or symptoms were diplopia and/or limited motility (45 of 69, 65%) and decreased or blurry vision (33 of 69, 48%). Treatment of the primary breast carcinoma with orbital metastases varied widely and changed over time with near-equal representation of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiation therapy. Documentation of survival time was inconsistent. Conclusions: Breast carcinoma, including metastatic disease, is increasingly characterized by improved survival and prolonged disease control in selected patients with advances in systemic therapy. In patients with a history of breast cancer, metastatic disease should be considered in those presenting with orbital pathology. Conversely, unexplained orbital findings may warrant evaluation for occult malignancy.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast carcinomaestrogen receptorFES PET/CTHER2oculoplasticsorbital metastasisreceptor discordance

Identifiers

PMID42404604
PMCPMC13329751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.