ArticleDigital health
Engagement and outcomes of children and adolescents enrolled in a technology-enabled mental health treatment platform: A retrospective cohort study: Differences by gender and age group.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: New digital technologies and platforms have enabled the additional provision of mental health services to counter the increased prevalence of mental health problems among children and adolescents. This real-world retrospective cohort study evaluates engagement levels and symptom improvement among children and adolescents receiving care through one such technology-enabled platform, and examines differences by gender and age group. Methods: We used descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression analyses to characterize the number of visits and depressive and anxiety symptom improvements among children and adolescents aged 9 to 17 with elevated depressive symptoms (n=9,853) and/or elevated anxiety symptoms (n=9,996) seen by a Grow Therapy therapist between January 2022 and April 2024. We also examined differences in engagement and outcomes by gender and age group. Results: Over half of the depressive and anxiety symptom cohorts, respectively, experienced a minimal clinically significant difference (MCID) in depressive symptoms (51.3%) and anxiety symptoms (57.8%). Although there were no significant interactions between gender and age group, females were less likely than males to meet criteria for MCID in the depressive and anxiety symptom cohorts despite being more likely to attend at least 3 provider visits. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest that therapists employed by Grow Therapy may have the potential to provide effective and engaging treatment for child and adolescent mental health. Gender differences in outcomes suggest the possible need for tailored care considerations for adolescent females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.