ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
An explainable machine learning model for predicting osteoporotic fragility fractures: a retrospective study in South China.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporotic fragility fractures often lead to hospitalization and impose a significant economic burden. To investigate the clinical characteristics of hospitalized major osteoporotic fractures in South China. Methods: In this study, we identified 1125 hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures who underwent DXA examination at the Yuebei People's Hospital between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2025. From these patients, we collected 73 features, including clinical, laboratory, and radiological features. Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) was applied to filter these features. Then we evaluated six machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, CatBoost, LightGBM, and Logistic Regression) to construct the best predictive model. In order to explain the model, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) was used to assess the importance of each attribute. Results: LightGBM achieved the highest training-set ROC-AUC (0.903) and the highest independent test-set ROC-AUC (0.840) among the six models. Through SHAP analysis, we observed that age, Hepatitis C virus IgG antibody, and serum sodium were identified as the top factors contributing to increased fracture risk. Conclusion: Our model has a good ability of predicting osteoporotic fragility fractures. This paves the way for earlier intervention in patients who are susceptible to osteoporotic fragility fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.