Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404427›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2026

Humanitarian data infrastructures for missing migrants: A multimodal and ethics-integrated framework.

M Fevzi Esen, Ecenur Aydemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Fevzi EsenDepartment of Health Information Systems, Hamidiye Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ecenur AydemirDepartment of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-4370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migrant disappearances have become a critical humanitarian crisis on global scale. However, the lack of strong, consolidated data across irregular migration routes is a barrier to effective intervention. In this paper, we aim to employ a sociotechnical systems perspective to design an ethics-infused infrastructure. Our primary objective is to convert multimodal digital traces into actionable intelligence, thereby supporting search, identification, and policy accountability. To standardize the analysis of decentralized digital evidence, we define a typology of 32 trace types encompassing ten domains, categorized from geospatial markers to psychosocial signals. This classification is the basis for the modular architecture of five linked cores. We present a novel approach that combines entity resolution and spatiotemporal reconstruction with provenance tracking and explainable AI to support effective humanitarian action. These features enable robust early warning capabilities and provide decision support aligned with OCHA standards. The framework aims to facilitate compliance with FAIR data principles and international human rights standards through embedding cross-layer safeguards including dynamic consent, auditability and interoperability. This research provides a scalable, replicable method to validate digital evidence throughout the migration cycle. It bridges computational innovation and rights-based governance. Future work should focus on operational pilots to assess feasibility, triage efficiency, identification accuracy, and family notification protocols.

Indexed as

Missing migrants; migration governance; sociotechnical systems; digital traces; humanitarian informatics; early warning systems.

Identifiers

PMID42404427
PMCPMC13332383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.