ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience2025
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation, leading to inflammation, oxidative stress, and impaired synaptic function. This study aimed to investigate the neuroprotective mechanisms of Methods: In an in vitro analysis, Aβ1-42 oligomers were used to induce mitophagy in SHSY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Cells were treated with VTF alone and in combination with chloroquine (CQ), a lysosomal inhibitor, to assess Aβ1-42-induced mitophagy. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and immunofluorescence (IFC) were used to investigate the effects of Aβ1-42 on autophagosomes and deposition. Cellular protection against Aβ-induced damage was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. Western blotting (WB) was used to determine the expression of autophagy-lysosomal pathway proteins (Beclin-1, Atg7, p62, and BACE1) and the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio, which serves as a marker of autophagy. Results: CQ and VTF demonstrated significant neuroprotection against Aβ1-42-induced neurodegeneration (P<0.05). VTF, alone or with CQ, increased viable cell count (~1.2-fold; P<0.05), indicating reparative capabilities. TEM and IFC showed robust protection by VTF and CQ against Aβ protein deposition, as well as preservation of mitochondrial and autophagosomal structures. VTF and CQ treatments reduced Beclin-1, Atg7, and BACE1 levels, indicating the modulation of mitophagy and autophagy-lysosomal suppression. VTF+CQ maintained LC3-II/LC3-I balance, confirming VTF's role in preserving autophagy (P<0.01). Conclusion: This study reveals the novel neuroprotective role of VTF, emphasizing its potential as an AD therapeutic. Future research should extend investigations to in vivo models and clinical settings to enhance our understanding of VTF's neuroprotective efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.