Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404404›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2026

Curriculum Innovation: A Multicenter Feasibility Study of a Consensus-Based Brain Death Simulation Curriculum.

Amjad Elmashala, Catherine S W Albin, Daniel S Harrison, Lauren Koffman, Xin Zhou, Jamie Nicole LaBuzetta, Rachel B Beekman, Stefanie P Cappucci, Matthew Bevers, Hera Kamdar and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Amjad ElmashalaDepartment of Neurology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-4044
Catherine S W AlbinDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8926-1703
Daniel S HarrisonBoston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-9878
Lauren KoffmanDepartment of Neurology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-2637
Xin ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7994-8949
Jamie Nicole LaBuzettaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7498-524X
Rachel B BeekmanDepartment of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-6762
Stefanie P CappucciDepartment of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-8495
Matthew BeversDepartment of Neurology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0878-8464
Hera KamdarDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Matthew T HoerthDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Ariane LewisNYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-7320
Sarah WahlsterDepartments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1744-1166
Justine CormierAyer Neuroscience Institute, Hartford Hospital & University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9100-4792
Jenna FordDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7626-4780
David Matthew GreerBoston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2026-8333
Nicholas A MorrisDepartment of Neurology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-9805
for CRESCENT Collaboration

Funding

Impact of Hourly Neurochecks in Critically Ill Older AdultsK23AG080023 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jamie Nicole LaBuzetta · 2024 to 2026
$665k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG080023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Problem Statement: Competency in brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination is an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestone in neurology residency and neurocritical care fellowship; however, trainees have limited clinical exposure and receive inconsistent training across institutions. Simulation offers a standardized, safe environment to teach and assess BD/DNC, but multi-institutional implementation remains unstudied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a consensus-based BD/DNC curriculum and to assess its impact on trainee confidence. Learning Objectives: By the end of the curriculum, trainees will be confident in assessing BD/DNC prerequisites, performing a complete neurologic examination, safely conducting and interpreting apnea testing, and accurately declaring BD/DNC. Methods and Curriculum Description: Through an iterative consensus process, 3 simulation cases addressing BD/DNC confounders were developed and implemented across high-fidelity and low-fidelity settings. Neurology residents and neurocritical care fellows were recruited by email from 6 academic centers in the United States. Participants each completed one case and received debriefing. Learning objectives were assessed using a 17-item, 5-point Likert pre/postsurvey assessing confidence across 4 BD/DNC domains: "Setup and Family Counseling," "Prerequisites," "Neurologic Examination," and "Apnea Test and Declaration of BD/DNC." Composite domain medians were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and change scores (post-pre) were compared between fidelity groups using the Mann-Whitney Results: Nineteen participants (9 female [47%]; predominantly PGY-4 trainees) were enrolled. Median [IQR] pre-post composite confidence scores improved significantly across all domains: "Setup and Family Counseling," 4 [3.5-4] to 4.5 [4-5]; "Prerequisites," 4 [4-5] to 4.5 [4-5]; "Neurologic Examination," 4 [4-4] to 4.5 [4-5]; and "Apnea Test and Declaration of BD/DNC," 3 [3-4] to 5 [4-5]. The effect sizes (Wilcoxon r) ranged from 0.79 to 0.88 across domains. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of improvement between high-fidelity and low-fidelity groups. After curriculum implementation, 13 of 19 participants (68%) self-assessed their ACGME BD/DNC milestone competency to be level 4 or 5. Discussion and Lessons Learned: This multi-institutional pilot demonstrated that a consensus-based BD/DNC simulation curriculum is feasible and improves trainee confidence despite limited previous clinical exposure. Key lessons include the feasibility of multicenter collaboration, standardizing core practices while accommodating local variability, and designing adaptable curricula that achieve similar outcomes across resource-diverse settings.

Identifiers

PMID42404404
PMCPMC13330576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.