ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Comparison of shoulder kinetics between running overhead throws with circular and whip-like wind up in elite handball players.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare shoulder kinetics between the whip-like and circular wind-ups in running throws in handball. Methods: Twenty-five elite handball players performed running throws with a circular and whip-like wind up while a markerless motion capture system consisting of eight cameras sampling at 250 Hz measured and calculated ball velocity, joint angle, angular velocity, shoulder torques and force during the throws. Results: The main findings were that peak ball and maximal angular external shoulder velocity were higher with the circular wind up together with time of occurrence to closer ball release of peak external rotation torque and peak posterior shear forces compared with the whip-like wind up, while a larger external shoulder rotation angle with a earlier time of occurrences was observed with the whip-like wind up. Discussion: It was concluded that although differences in shoulder kinematics between the two wind-ups were observed it did not result in differences in peak shoulder torque and forces, only in timing. Thereby, both throws seem to cause similar stress upon the shoulder. Thereby, both throws seem to cause similar stress upon the shoulder. While no statistically significant differences in peak shoulder torques and forces were observed between techniques; however, due to the sample size, variability in throwing experience, and the absence of equivalence testing, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence that both techniques impose equivalent shoulder stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.