ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
ERYXSeg: a hybrid CNN architecture for robust and resource-aware wound segmentation.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In modern clinical practice, the accuracy of wound segmentation is important because it allows for data-driven treatment planning, accurate evaluation of the wound area, and tracking of the healing process. In this paper, we introduce ERYXSeg, an integrated deep learning architecture that combines residual skip connections, a parameter-efficient core, and spatial localization and boundary-aware refinement of a segmentation head. The proposed method achieves robust performance across a wide range of wound types by capturing both local fine-grained characteristics and rich contextual information. ERYXSeg outperforms the current state-of-the-art models under identical training settings after being trained from scratch on mixed wound datasets. It achieves the highest reported IoU and Dice scores in both datasets: 0.7633 IoU and 0.8658 Dice for the foot ulcer dataset and 0.6910 IoU and 0.8173 Dice for the curated mixed wound dataset. The contribution of each architectural element is further validated by a systematic ablation study, which shows that attention-gated skip connections are crucial for accurate spatial reconstruction across various data sources and that Mobile Inverted Bottleneck Convolution (MBConv) blocks are essential for extracting broadly applicable features. The results obtained demonstrate excellent generalization and high computational efficiency of the model, which thus qualifies it for real-time clinical deployment independent of transfer learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.