ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Trofinetide Use and Treatment Patterns Among Children Aged 2-4 Years with Rett Syndrome in the United States: A Retrospective Specialty Pharmacy Linked Claims Database Analysis.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rett syndrome (RTT) is a rare, X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder that primarily affects females. Trofinetide (TROF) was approved for RTT in individuals aged ≥2 years. Although the DAFFODIL trial examined TROF efficacy in children aged 2-4 years, real-world evidence in this age group remains limited. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using linked medical and pharmacy claims from 01/01/2021-09/30/2024 (study period). Individuals aged 2-4 years with RTT who initiated TROF during 04/01/2023-03/31/2024 (identification period) were included (index date=first TROF RX). Outcomes included baseline characteristics, prescriber specialty, TROF persistence (≤90-day allowable gap), dosing patterns based on shipped/dispensed RXs (BID, mg; % target daily dose [%TDD]), time on treatment, and restarts among non-persistent individuals. Variables were summarized descriptively. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed the time to treatment non-persistence. Results: Among 159 individuals, 65.4% were persistent and 34.6% were non-persistent; 14.5% of non-persistent individuals restarted TROF. Mean±SD age was 3.2±0.8 vs 3.3±0.7 years in persistent vs non-persistent groups. Females comprised 95.2% vs 87.3%, respectively. Child neurology was the most common prescriber specialty (54.8% vs 63.6%). Non-persistent individuals had higher rates of dysphagia (34.5% vs 16.3%), gastrostomy (20.0% vs 3.8%), and breathing irregularities (16.4% vs 1.9%). Mean BID dose and %TDD were similar between groups across shipments. Median (IQR) time on treatment was 13.3 (6.1-17.2) months in the persistent group vs 4.4 (0.8-12.6) months in the non-persistent group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed >87.5% remained on TROF beyond 3 months and >65.0% remained on TROF through end of available follow-up. Conclusion: In routine US practice, approximately two-thirds of children aged 2-4 years initiating TROF remained persistent during available follow-up, with sustained use beyond 1 year and a subset (14.5% of non-persistent children) restarting after discontinuation. Non-persistent children had significantly higher baseline rates of dysphagia, gastrostomy, and breathing irregularities, suggesting that early disease-related multisystem complications may be associated with reduced treatment continuity. These findings complement DAFFODIL and provide early real-world evidence on TROF persistence, restarts, and dosing patterns in this young RTT population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.