Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404289›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026

Navigating Alzheimer's Disease in Primary Care: Practical Strategies for Diagnosis and Management.

Scott T Larson, Jeffrey L Susman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott T LarsonCarver College of Medicine Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA.
Jeffrey L SusmanJohn Sealy School of Medicine Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is a neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects older adults. Because the number of Americans 65 years of age and older living with AD is expected to increase and the availability of specialty physicians, such as neurologists and geriatricians, is limited, the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing patients with AD is expected to grow. Several guidelines for primary care providers are available for the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with AD. However, there is no single concise and convenient reference tool for use in the primary care setting. In the primary care setting, clinicians are responsible for identifying patients at risk or demonstrating signs of cognitive impairment, administering cognitive tests, identifying appropriate referrals, and, in some cases, ordering blood-based biomarker testing. Although definitive testing and treatment identification may occur in the specialty care setting, in addition to serving as the hub to coordinate the multidisciplinary care team, primary care clinicians remain responsible for guiding patients and caregivers through shared decision-making regarding treatment, as well as the myriad responsibilities related to comorbidities, patient and caregiver psychological well-being, social support, and safety. This review aims to provide practical recommendations to primary care clinicians for the diagnosis, management, and long-term care of patients with AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasediagnosisguidelinetreatment

Identifiers

PMID42404289
PMCPMC13332422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.