ArticleNeurocomputing2026
Decoding pre-movement neural activity from thalamic LFPs for adaptive neurostimulation in tremor patients.
Article in Neurocomputing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To advance adaptive deep brain stimulation for tremor disorders, we investigated the feasibility of using machine learning to decode pre-movement oscillatory changes in thalamic local field potentials (LFPs) and scalp electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Our aim was to predict upcoming upper-limb movements based on these neural signals. Approach: We recorded and analysed from 11 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery for the treatment of tremor, employing machine learning models-including logistic regression, gradient-boosted decision trees, and convolutional neural networks-to distinguish rest periods from pre-movement periods. Main results: We demonstrate that early neural correlates can predict movement onset, achieving above-chance decoding performance starting approximately 430 ms before movement initiation using thalamic LFP and 840 ms using EEG signals. Individualised, patient-specific decoders outperformed cross-patient models, reflecting inter-patient variability in neural modulatory patterns. Additionally, multiple frequency bands contributed independently to decoding performance, highlighting the importance of incorporating a spectrum of frequencies rather than relying solely on activity in any single canonical band. Significance: These findings underscore the value of personalised, multi-band machine learning-based approaches for capturing the neural correlates preceding movement. They support the development of adaptive neurostimulation therapies through tailored models that account for patient-specific patterns in neural activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.