ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Behind the scenes of a 7T MRI clinical study in Alzheimer's disease: challenges and recommendations for future research.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combining pharmacological interventions with neuroimaging in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research presents logistical and methodological challengesparticularly during early study phases, such as recruitment and study visits. Yet, these challenges are rarely reported in detail. This perspective article shares early-phase experiences from a 7-tesla (7T) fMRI clinical study involving individuals with mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD) and mild Alzheimer's disease dementia (mild ADD), highlighting recruitment hurdles and offering practical recommendations. From a pool of 1,001 patients, 476 had a clinical diagnosis of MCI-AD or mild ADD; after pre-selection and screening, only 48 participants (10%) met all inclusion criteria. Major exclusion factors included metal or tattoos (8%), missing surgical documentation (2%), beta-blocker use (27.5%), recent cancer/chemotherapy or brain radiation (1%), and lack of interest (20%). Effective communication, often requiring caregiver assistance, was essential for obtaining accurate medical histories and improving adherence. Internally, clear team coordination supported scheduling and protocol compliance. While strict eligibility criteria improve data quality, they can substantially limit recruitment and feasibility in pharmacological and high-field MRI drug studies. We propose strategies to optimize recruitment and screening, facilitate data collection, and balance scientific rigor with real-world clinical feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.