Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404232›Full record

ArticlePsychologica Belgica2026

Household Labour During the Workday in Remote Work Contexts. Who Integrates It, and Why?

Nathan Pudles, Marine Willeput, Sabine Pohl, Catherine Hellemans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychologica Belgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathan PudlesDepartment of Work and Consumer Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5295-9360
Marine WilleputDepartment of Work and Consumer Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8766-7161
Sabine PohlDepartment of Work and Consumer Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7686-3983
Catherine HellemansDepartment of Work and Consumer Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-3033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote work is often presented as a means to balance out work and family domains, by giving the ability to integrate the two domains. Using border theory and social role theory as a framework, the present study aims to uncover the relationships of autonomy, job demands, work engagement, and the involvement with domestic tasks, with doing household labour during the workday (HLW), and how these relationships may differ depending on gender. The study was conducted among a sample of 1309 workers (65.77% women), who worked remotely at least once a week. Hypotheses were tested with a logistic regression and fractional polynomials. Results were in contradiction with the hypothesized relationships. Job demands and work engagement increased the probability of doing HLW. Autonomy decreased the probability of doing HLW. Involvement in domestic tasks was non-linearly associated with HLW. Specifically, workers who had to deal with domestic tasks mostly by themselves were more likely to resort to HLW, whereas others were less likely to do so. The relationships of autonomy, job demands, work engagement and IDT with HLW did not differ depending on gender.

Indexed as

border theoryfractional polynomialshousehold labourRemote worksocial roles theory

Identifiers

PMID42404232
PMCPMC13330990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.