ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Past present and future of radiosensitization in cervical cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a major health concern with over 662,000 cases and 348,000 deaths worldwide yearly. Treatment of early stage disease is generally surgical resection with excellent 5-year survival rates. Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is potentially curable but still has only an approximately 50% 5-year survival rate. LACC is currently treated with chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin). Cisplatin as a radiosensitizer was established by 4 seminal, randomized clinical trials in the 1990s. While radiation techniques have advanced significantly over the past 25 years, the use of cisplatin as a radiosensitizer has not changed. With the development of new, more precise chemotherapy regimens in the form of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), these drugs would have the ability to improve the therapeutic index of radiotherapy. While ADCs have proven improvement in overall survival and progression free survival in metastatic cervical cancer, they are yet to be studied in the LACC population.] Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have also shown improved outcomes in use with metastatic cervical cancer and LACC. We feel that ICIs should be considered as an adjuvant therapy to the more precise ADC radiotherapy to improve tumor control. In summary, multimodal ADC-radio-immunotherapy may benefit patients with LACC and warrants investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.