ArticleSubstance use : research and treatment
An Initial Survey Assessing the Temporal Relationship of Kratom Initiation With Medical Treatment and Substance Use.
Article in Substance use : research and treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmacists' Perceived Knowledge of Kratom and Hemp-Derived Cannabinoids Before and after Education.Substance use : research and treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intro: Kratom use is growing for both therapeutic and non-therapeutic effects. This survey assessed the temporal relationship between kratom initiation and prior, subsequent, or concurrent substance use or medical treatment. Methods: This cross-sectional, anonymous electronic survey was disseminated to American Kratom Association and Global Kratom Coalition members from 3/2025-9/2025. Adults aged ≥18 years who reported past or current kratom use were eligible. A novel questionnaire was generated assessing: kratom and other substance use characteristics; pursuit of medical treatment for selected diagnoses; and temporal relationships between kratom use and substance use or medical treatment. Results: Of 161 respondents included, most (95.7%) currently versus previously used kratom. Whole-leaf product use was reported most often (90.3%), with 38.3% reporting concentrated kratom extracts and 16.9% single alkaloid isolates. Reasons for kratom use were therapeutic (50.3%), non-therapeutic (16.1%), or both (33.5%). Therapeutic (self-treatment) use was most commonly cited for pain (86.2%), mental focus (52.3%), mental health (46.9%), sleep (43.1%), and substance use disorder (27.7%). Most respondents had used ≥1 other psychoactive substance in their lifetime, including cannabis (74.3%), alcohol (68.2%), stimulants (43.2%), sedatives (33.1%), non-prescribed opioids (26.4%), or tobacco (6.1%); 10.1% reported no prior substance use besides kratom. Whether used for non-therapeutic or therapeutic purposes, kratom was rarely initiated first. Among those with a substance use history, only 3-10% reported trying kratom prior to other substances reported. Among those with pertinent medical conditions, 0-20% initiated kratom before receiving medical care for their reported conditions. Conclusion: This study builds on previous research assessing kratom use motivations, providing insight into the temporal relationship between kratom initiation and substance use or medical treatment. Kratom was rarely the first substance or therapeutic treatment tried, but rather most individuals initiated it concurrently with or after discontinuing other substances or medical care. Larger follow-up studies are warranted to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.