ArticleEvolutionary applications2026
Meeting Report on the Assisted Gene Flow and Climate Change Responses Workshop, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, CA, USA, 5-7 March 2025.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic climate change is rapidly disrupting populations and ecosystems, challenging conservationists to identify effective interventions. Assisted gene flow (AGF), the human-assisted movement of species within their historic range to increase the population health of climate-threatened species, offers a promising but controversial strategy for enhancing resilience. To address the complexities of strategies for conserving species in anticipation of changing climates, we convened the Assisted Gene Flow and Climate Change Responses workshop from March 5-7, 2025, in Golden Gate National Recreation Area, California. The workshop was intended to be a forum for land managers, native seed producers, and academic scientists working in California and Oregon to discuss current and emerging knowledge of climate change responses, experiences, best practices, and policy associated with guiding ecologically informed applications of AGF in plants. The workshop brought together 28 participants, including land managers from five state or federal entities, native seed producers from two nurseries, and academic scientists from eight institutions. Through synthetic discussions, workshop participants identified major barriers to implementation, outlined critical outstanding questions, and proposed opportunities for coordination and joint action. The group reached an important consensus that while imperfect information remains, the risks of inaction are substantial, necessitating improved communication and immediate cross-sector collaboration to support land and restoration management in effectively implementing these strategies. Moreover, the group highlighted how restoration projects are evolutionary experiments that can be leveraged to address outstanding fundamental and applied questions, and the critical need for the development of evidence-based consensus guidelines to bridge the gap between research and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.