ReviewFrontiers in neurology
Cerebral venous disorders: clinical presentation, diagnostic strategy, and contemporary management.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral venous disorders encompass a heterogeneous group of conditions ranging from acute cerebral venous thrombosis to chronic intracranial venous hypertension and stenotic outflow states. Although historically considered uncommon, increasing recognition, improved imaging techniques, and expanding endovascular therapies have led to significant advances in the diagnosis and management of these conditions. This review provides a contemporary overview of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment strategies for major cerebral venous disorders, with an emphasis on conditions associated with elevated intracranial venous pressure and medically refractory symptoms. We summarize current evidence regarding noninvasive and invasive imaging modalities, including the evolving roles of CT and MR venography, catheter venography, and physiologic pressure measurements. Indications for medical therapy, including anticoagulation and intracranial pressure management, are discussed alongside emerging criteria for patient selection for endovascular intervention. Particular attention is given to venous sinus stenting and other endovascular techniques, including technical considerations, outcomes, and complication profiles. Controversies remain regarding diagnostic thresholds, the clinical significance of venous stenosis, optimal hemodynamic criteria for intervention, and long-term durability of endovascular treatment. We highlight areas of ongoing investigation and identify key knowledge gaps that may inform future research. As diagnostic capabilities and therapeutic options continue to evolve, a multidisciplinary and physiology-guided approach is essential to optimize patient selection and outcomes in cerebral venous disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.