ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Orthopedic Provider Accuracy for Ultrasound Detection of Peripheral Nerve Injuries: A Cadaveric Educational Study.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the ability of ultrasound to detect peripheral nerve injuries among orthopedic providers before and after a short educational module. Methods: Fifteen orthopedic providers used handheld Butterfly iQ+ and cart-based Sonosite SII ultrasound to evaluate peripheral nerve injury patterns created in cadaveric specimens. Participants assessed complete lacerations, partial lacerations, intact nerves, end neuromas, and neuromas in continuity at three upper-extremity sites: the dorsoradial forearm (radial sensory nerve), proximal forearm (proximal median nerve), and distal forearm (distal median nerve). Each participant evaluated all sites with both devices and predicted the injury pattern. Testing was repeated three weeks later after a brief ultrasound educational module. Results: Posteducational module, diagnostic accuracy improved for laceration patterns and intact nerves, whereas accuracy for neuroma identification remained limited. Participants with prior ultrasound experience generally performed better, and diagnostic performance was similar between the handheld and cart-based devices. Conclusions: A brief targeted educational module showed modest gains in diagnostic accuracy for laceration patterns and intact nerves proposing that ultrasound may be useful as an adjunct for identifying these injuries. Similar observed performance between handheld and cart-based devices suggests that provider interpretation may be more important than ultrasound device. Clinical relevance: Orthopedic providers should undergo focused training for clinical adoption of ultrasound to improve diagnostic accuracy in peripheral nerve injuries. Similar accuracy between handheld and cart-based systems may also reduce barriers to incorporate ultrasound into hand-surgery practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.