ArticleBMJ neurology open2026
Inpatient versus outpatient management of bilateral optic nerve head elevation presentation to a tertiary emergency department.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Increased accessibility to fundus cameras has changed the referral pattern for patients with suspected bilateral optic nerve head elevation (BONHE) presenting to emergency departments (EDs). We aim to review the management of these patients to streamline the process. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with suspected BONHE referred to a tertiary centre ED between 2017 and 2022. We collected demographics, referral source, clinical assessment, neuroimaging and retinal imaging results. Final diagnosis and treatment outcomes were compared between those managed as inpatients and those managed as outpatients. Results: 100 patients were referred to the ED with a suspected BONHE. Most were referred by optometrists (54) or general practitioners (17). 54 were admitted (group A) and 38 were discharged from ED (group B). The remaining eight had incomplete records, transferred out of a public health system or self-discharged. The median duration of stay in the ED was 5 hours (IQR 3.45-6.12). The most common diagnosis for both groups was idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). 47 patients at follow-up had moderate to severe IIH and other significant pathologies. For these patients, vision impairment at presentation is the only statistically significant predictor on multivariate analysis (p=0.03). Based on the final diagnoses, 26 out of 48 patients (54.2%) in group A were diagnosed with IIH, with a median duration from presentation to diagnosis of 2 days (IQR 1-4 days). In group B, 8 out of 29 patients (27.5%) were diagnosed with IIH on follow-up, and the median duration from first presentation to diagnosis was 16.8 days (IQR 5.8-57 days). Conclusions: IIH is the most common diagnosis among ED presentations of suspected BONHE in our study. We proposed a triage system for prompt management of BONHE to optimise triage and timely management of patients in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.