ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Computer vision system for assessing pig welfare indicators on carcasses.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an increasing societal demand for transparency in reporting on the quality of life of farmed animals reared for meat production. High animal welfare standards are also associated with improved efficiency and the sustainability of production systems, but they also play a critical role in ensuring food quality and safety. The routine monitoring of animal welfare is crucial for tracking performance to ensure high welfare standards are met. Traditional on-farm welfare assessments conducted by human observers are subjective and prone to observer bias, time-consuming, costly, and pose risks to biosecurity. Monitoring the welfare of pigs at slaughter provides an option for animal welfare oversight across large numbers of animals to verify and complement on-farm assessments. We present a real-time computer vision system for the automated assessment of pig welfare indicators on carcasses. The system evaluates skin and tail lesions, tail length, and hernias using a modular pipeline that combines YOLOv4 detection, U-Net segmentation, and colorimetric and geometric analysis. The architecture robustness was demonstrated by processing video streams containing specific welfare conditions, yielding accuracies of 93.0% for hernias (16 pigs, 1 min), 86.3% and 90.4% for dorsal and lateral skin lesions (75 pigs, 7 min and 40 pigs, 3 min, respectively), and 86.8% for tail lesions (63 pigs, 5 min). Tail length is estimated via a custom segmentation and curve-fitting process, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 4.45 cm. Operating at 30.31 FPS, the framework offers a scalable and objective solution for real-time welfare monitoring in industrial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.