ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
Psychosocial Risks among Emergency Medical Services Personnel.
Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel are frequently exposed to challenging working conditions that may contribute to psychosocial risks. Understanding these risks is critical for improving occupational health and developing preventive strategies. This study aimed to identify psychosocial risk factors among EMS personnel in Artvin, Turkey. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed. Data were collected from 68 participants using a sociodemographic characteristics form and the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Nonparametric statistical tests, including the Mann-Whitney Results: Among the EMS personnel surveyed, 47.5% were found to be at high risk in at least one psychosocial domain. Statistically significant differences were observed based on gender and professional role. Specifically, female EMS workers reported higher levels of emotional demands ( Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of addressing psychosocial risks in EMS settings. Factors such as professional role, working hours, and organizational support play a key role in shaping risk perception. Targeted interventions, including workload regulation, professional development, and supportive management strategies, are essential to enhance the well-being and resilience of EMS workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.