ArticleDialogues in health2026
Beyond urban bias: A circulation-based model for equitable medical workforce distribution.
Article in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Urban-rural healthcare disparities remain a global challenge, driven by the concentration of medical resources in urban centers. We developed a circulation-based model integrating medical resource allocation, education, and digital health. Since 2020, this program has been implemented in Hokkaido, Japan. This study examines its structure and outcomes. Methods: The model includes physician and trainee rotation, structured referral pathways, community-based medical education, and digital infrastructure. A three-tier system was established: Esashi (primary/secondary care), Hakodate (tertiary center), and Sapporo (education and physician dispatch hub). Outcomes were assessed in three domains: health outcomes, financial sustainability, and educational outcomes. Educational outcomes were based on a previously published study in the same cohort. Results: Health outcomes showed overall improvement, with the standardized mortality ratio decreasing from 103.4 to 98.3 in males and from 104.8 to 100.5 in females, although these changes were not statistically significant. Pneumonia-related SMR decreased significantly in both males and females. Financial indicators improved, with inpatient revenue per patient increasing significantly from 26,553 to 38,478 JPY. In addition, medical students reported increased confidence in clinical competencies. Conclusion: This model improved health, financial, and educational outcomes by coordinating physician mobility, tiered regional collaboration, and digital connectivity.(195words).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.