Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42404010›Full record

ArticleNonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly2026

Bridging Divides or Widening Gaps? Nonprofit Organizations' Efforts for Migrant Inclusion in Two Global Cities.

Yan Long, Wei Luo, Berta Terzieva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan LongUniversity of California, Berkeley, USA.
Wei LuoPeking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6037-2898
Berta TerzievaVienna University of Economics and Business, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5524-2432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonprofit organizations are often seen as critical nodes in shaping migrant experiences and supporting the inclusion and representation within host communities. In doing so, nonprofits encounter numerous obstacles. With this study, we explore the factors influencing how well nonprofits include, reach out to, and serve migrants relative to their local presence. We analyze organizational survey data from two distinct urban contexts: Vienna (Austria) and Shenzhen (China), each with unique institutional, political, and cultural backgrounds. Our findings suggest that interpersonal contact and representative governance in nonprofit organizations are closely linked to their (un)responsiveness to the needs of migrant populations. These results challenge the often-idealized perceptions of urban civic spaces and community interactions, underscoring the paradoxical mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion.

Indexed as

diversity alignmentinterpersonal contactmigrant inclusionrepresentative governancestate and market forces

Identifiers

PMID42404010
PMCPMC13331349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.