Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403966›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Audiology2026

Bimodal Stimulation of the Auditory-Somatosensory System Improves Auditory Sensory Gating Function in Patients with Tinnitus.

Masoud Bolandi, Moslem Shaabani, Enayatollah Bakhshi, Athareh Farahani, Mohanna Javanbakht

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masoud BolandiDepartment of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6894-1986
Moslem ShaabaniDepartment of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3614-1011
Enayatollah BakhshiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8049-0190
Athareh FarahaniDepartment of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3876-1351
Mohanna JavanbakhtDepartment of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2876-3208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tinnitus perception may be associated with impairments in the mechanisms of sensory gating (SG), which is a preattentive process that filters redundant auditory stimuli to prevent sensory overload. Acoustic stimulation of the auditory system alone (unimodal intervention), electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve alone, or a combination of both (bimodal intervention) can effectively treat tinnitus by influencing SG. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the impact of unimodal and bimodal interventions on auditory SG (ASG). Research Design: Participants were assigned to unimodal or bimodal intervention groups using block randomization after obtaining consent. Study Sample: Thirty-four participants with tonal tinnitus were divided equally into unimodal ( Intervention: Participants in the bimodal group received customized acoustic stimulation combined with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tAVNS). Participants in the unimodal group received the same acoustic stimulation paired with sham tAVNS. Each group underwent six 20-minute treatment sessions. Data Collection and Analysis: Participants were assessed using the ASG (dividing the P1-N1 amplitude of the second cortical auditory evoked potential [CAEP] by the P1-N1 amplitude of the first CAEP) and an 11-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for loudness, awareness, and annoyance before and after the intervention sessions. Patients rated these items from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no tinnitus and 10 representing intense loudness, awareness, and annoyance. Postintervention group comparisons were performed using a covariance analysis. Within-group changes were assessed with paired Results: After the intervention, the results showed that the bimodal group experienced a significant decrease in ASG and loudness and awareness VAS scores relative to those of the unimodal group (p < 0.05). No significant change in the annoyance VAS score was found between groups. A correlation was observed between ASG and the awareness and annoyance VAS scores, but no correlation was found between ASG and the loudness VAS score. Conclusion: As a treatment option for tinnitus, bimodal stimulation appears to be more effective than unimodal stimulation. This method may be particularly beneficial for tonal tinnitus with hearing loss; however, it may not be effective for all patients. Therefore, a clinical protocol is required. Clinical Relevance Statement: Bimodal stimulation may offer a clinically meaningful intervention for patients with tinnitus, particularly those with hearing loss who experience tonal tinnitus.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationSensory GatingTinnitusVagus Nerve StimulationAdultAgedEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomeauditorybimodal stimulationsensory gatingtinnitusvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42403966
PMCPMC13327965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.