ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Vowel acoustic parameters in speech assessment and rehabilitation of minimally verbal and speech-motor-impaired autistic children: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speech production difficulties in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are heterogeneous and are not uniformly characterized by articulatory impairment across the spectrum. However, some autistic subgroups, particularly minimally verbal children, children with low expressive-language ability, and those with suspected co-occurring speech-motor difficulties, may show atypical vowel-acoustic patterns. Because vowel production can be quantified through measures such as formant frequencies, vowel-space area, duration, and variability, these parameters may offer useful objective information for characterizing speech impairment and informing rehabilitation planning in selected phenotypes. This narrative review critically examined the literature on vowel-acoustic characteristics in autistic children and their possible relevance to rehabilitation-oriented systems. Structured searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were conducted for studies published up to September 2025. Evidence suggests that some autistic subgroups may exhibit reduced vowel distinctiveness, greater acoustic variability, and atypical temporal or dynamic speech features, although findings are heterogeneous and do not support a single uniform acoustic profile across ASD. Direct intervention evidence remains limited. Most rehabilitation-related studies are small, exploratory investigations, and the available literature is concentrated largely around Auditory-Motor Mapping Training (AMMT), an indirectly relevant speech-motor intervention that reports vowel-related outcomes but does not directly target vowel-acoustic parameters in isolation.Overall, vowel-acoustic measures are better regarded as candidate quantitative tools for subgroup characterization, monitoring, and rehabilitation planning rather than as universal biomarkers across ASD. Their translational potential is promising but remains insufficiently validated, requiring stronger longitudinal, mechanistic, and intervention research before broad clinical application can be justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.