ArticleJournal of cognition2026
Imaginative Thought.
Article in Journal of cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
I suggest that the imagination is the engine of the mind. Its power can be illustrated in several domains that otherwise may seem quite disparate. I start first with moral decision making. Experimental results show the power of our imagination in bringing about immediate change in our moral judgments. Even actions we consider completely morally unacceptable can become neutralised. The impact of the moral imagination has many consequences, including its effects on our ability to understand other people's perspectives and their sometimes false beliefs. Next, I turn to causal reasoning. Experimental results show that the entertainment of counterfactual possibilities drives our causal explanations, even though causal and counterfactual explanations can have very different content. The impact of the causal imagination has many consequences including its effects on our ability to understand decisions made by Artificial Intelligence decision support systems. In the final section, I consider the mechanics of the imagination and the cognitive processes that underlie the mental simulation of alternatives to reality. Experimental results show that we construct mental models to represent the meaning of a counterfactual conditional. Our imagination of multiple possibilities has many consequences, including its effects on counterfactual inferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.