Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403935›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2026

Imaginative Thought.

Ruth M J Byrne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ruth M J ByrneTrinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-1211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I suggest that the imagination is the engine of the mind. Its power can be illustrated in several domains that otherwise may seem quite disparate. I start first with moral decision making. Experimental results show the power of our imagination in bringing about immediate change in our moral judgments. Even actions we consider completely morally unacceptable can become neutralised. The impact of the moral imagination has many consequences, including its effects on our ability to understand other people's perspectives and their sometimes false beliefs. Next, I turn to causal reasoning. Experimental results show that the entertainment of counterfactual possibilities drives our causal explanations, even though causal and counterfactual explanations can have very different content. The impact of the causal imagination has many consequences including its effects on our ability to understand decisions made by Artificial Intelligence decision support systems. In the final section, I consider the mechanics of the imagination and the cognitive processes that underlie the mental simulation of alternatives to reality. Experimental results show that we construct mental models to represent the meaning of a counterfactual conditional. Our imagination of multiple possibilities has many consequences, including its effects on counterfactual inferences.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencecausal reasoningcounterfactual conditionalsdeductive inferenceexplanationsfalse beliefsImaginationmoral decision-making

Identifiers

PMID42403935
PMCPMC13330857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.