Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403934›Full record

ReviewEducational psychology review2026

A Mixed-methods Study of How to Improve Primary-secondary Transitions in England: Combining Academic Research with Policy and Practice Consultation.

C L Bagnall, D Edge, E Banwell, R Seymour, N Garnett, C Mason, M Panayiotou, D Jindal-Snape, R Packer, K Hodgkin and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Educational psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Design and implementation ofFrontiers in psychology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

C L BagnallManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, England M13 9PL UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7213-2668
D EdgeManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, England M13 9PL UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5625-2061
E BanwellManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, England M13 9PL UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0922-4727
R SeymourManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, England M13 9PL UK.
N GarnettLiverpool John Moores, Liverpool, England.ORCID 0000-0002-3643-763X
C MasonManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, England M13 9PL UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6037-4950
M PanayiotouManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, England M13 9PL UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6023-7961
D Jindal-SnapeUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-3851-3381
R PackerCardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, Wales.ORCID 0000-0002-1976-8410
K HodgkinCardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, Wales.ORCID 0000-0001-7546-2187
C SkerrittTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3695-758X
C DonaldsonCardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.ORCID 0000-0003-3307-1991
J BirchwoodUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.ORCID 0000-0002-0505-3457
A McAreaveyManchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, England.ORCID 0009-0002-8615-1901
E CunninghamUniversity of Waikato, Waikato, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7894-1503
J E SymondsUniversity College London, London, England.ORCID 0000-0003-4259-6124
A HollimanUniversity College London, London, England.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-6666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary-secondary school transitions are critical periods in children's educational and emotional development, which pose heightened risk for poor attainment, attendance, social adjustment, and mental health, particularly for vulnerable children. Yet, the multiple challenges presented during this time remain difficult for English schools to manage without clear statutory guidance. Government reports consistently identify transitions as a systemic weakness, while practitioners report uncertainty about what to prioritise, resulting in highly variable, locally interpreted provision. It is important that best practice guidance is developed, drawing on evidence from research, policy, and practice, to inform an evidence-informed transitions strategy in England. To narrow this gap, the present research takes an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, triangulating multiple stakeholder perspectives and multidisciplinary evidence to develop an evidence-based framework with policy recommendations. A systematic literature review was first conducted to explore key priority areas identified within existing research. Building on these insights, 10 round-table discussions were conducted to aggregate multi-disciplinary perspectives of 52 experts within educational practice, research, and policy, nationwide. Data were analysed using Thematic Framework Analysis, to identify barriers and facilitators in implementing high-quality primary-secondary school transitions provision, and what key priority areas should be included in national strategy. Meta-inferences were then drawn to develop an evidence-based framework outlining five policy recommendations, with implementation proposals of how each might be enacted in practice. This research offers a conceptual foundation to inform policy and could have practical utility for informing high-quality research and practice. Practical and contextual challenges associated with introducing a statutory transitions strategy in England are considered.

Indexed as

Co-productionEducational policyEmotional wellbeingInterventionMeasurementPrimary-secondary school transitions

Identifiers

PMID42403934
PMCPMC13332981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.