Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403917›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2026

Long vs. short axial field-of-view PET scanners for brain imaging: a phantom study.

Laura Providência, Valentina Turmacu, Philipp Mohr, Chris W J van der Weijden, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Adriaan A Lammertsma, Charalampos Tsoumpas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura ProvidênciaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Valentina TurmacuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Philipp MohrDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Chris W J van der WeijdenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Rudi A J O DierckxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Adriaan A LammertsmaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Charalampos TsoumpasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET scanners offer substantially higher sensitivity compared to conventional short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) systems, potentially enabling reduced injected activity, shorter acquisition times, and improved signal-to-noise ratios in brain imaging. However, given the geometric differences between these systems, it is important to assess whether these differences impact image quality and quantitative accuracy before translating established SAFOV protocols to LAFOV systems. This study has two goals: (1) to compare image quality (IQ) metrics between a SAFOV PET scanner (Siemens Biograph Vision) and a LAFOV PET scanner (Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra) using a Hoffman brain phantom, and (2) to quantify the effective axial sensitivity gain provided by the LAFOV system for brain imaging. Methods: Two phantom experiments were performed: the first assessed IQ metrics and the influence of external background activity, while the second evaluated brain-specific sensitivity at different axial positions within the LAFOV scanner. Results: Overall, IQ metrics were highly comparable between scanners and were minimally affected by external background activity. Positioning the phantom at the first detector ring of the LAFOV scanner yielded a 1.2-1.4 Conclusion: These findings indicate that LAFOV PET systems maintain quantitative consistency with SAFOV scanners while offering higher sensitivity. This supports the development of optimized PET imaging protocols to reduce injected activity and radiation exposure, thereby improving safety and enabling broader inclusion of vulnerable populations in brain PET studies.

Indexed as

brain PET imagingdose reductionlong axial field-of-view PETsensitivity gainshort axial field-of-view PET

Identifiers

PMID42403917
PMCPMC13328276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.