ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2026
Long vs. short axial field-of-view PET scanners for brain imaging: a phantom study.
Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET scanners offer substantially higher sensitivity compared to conventional short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) systems, potentially enabling reduced injected activity, shorter acquisition times, and improved signal-to-noise ratios in brain imaging. However, given the geometric differences between these systems, it is important to assess whether these differences impact image quality and quantitative accuracy before translating established SAFOV protocols to LAFOV systems. This study has two goals: (1) to compare image quality (IQ) metrics between a SAFOV PET scanner (Siemens Biograph Vision) and a LAFOV PET scanner (Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra) using a Hoffman brain phantom, and (2) to quantify the effective axial sensitivity gain provided by the LAFOV system for brain imaging. Methods: Two phantom experiments were performed: the first assessed IQ metrics and the influence of external background activity, while the second evaluated brain-specific sensitivity at different axial positions within the LAFOV scanner. Results: Overall, IQ metrics were highly comparable between scanners and were minimally affected by external background activity. Positioning the phantom at the first detector ring of the LAFOV scanner yielded a 1.2-1.4 Conclusion: These findings indicate that LAFOV PET systems maintain quantitative consistency with SAFOV scanners while offering higher sensitivity. This supports the development of optimized PET imaging protocols to reduce injected activity and radiation exposure, thereby improving safety and enabling broader inclusion of vulnerable populations in brain PET studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.