ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Secondary Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis and
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Secondary oral vancomycin prophylaxis has been reported to reduce rates of recurrent Methods: This was a retrospective study of children and young adults with cancer with primary CDI episode treated from 2017 to 2024. To determine the causal impact of secondary oral vancomycin prophylaxis during antibiotic administration to prevent CDI in the 6 months after the primary episode, propensity score matching and weighted generalized estimating equations were performed. Results: The initial cohort included 163 patients who experienced primary CDI. After exclusions, 72 patients received 150 courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics within 6 months following their initial infection. Fifteen patients received 27 episodes of OVP. CDIs were not significantly decreased, occurring in 22 of 123 (17.9%) courses in patients who did not receive OVP and 2 of 27 (7.4%) in courses with prophylaxis. Propensity score matching resulted in 49 broad-spectrum antibiotic episodes from 19 patients, forming 11 matched sets. Receipt of OVP was significantly associated with reduced risk of CDI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.074 [95% confidence interval, .01-.54]). Conclusions: In this single-center retrospective study of children and young adults with cancer with primary CDI, receipt of OVP was significantly associated with reduced risk of CDI recurrence when receiving broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Given the small sample size and likely residual confounding, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating pending confirmation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.