Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403859›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Burden and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients.

Anakath M Ijas, Gayathry Rajasekharan, Chinthu Sara Jacob, Vijayakumar Anil, Rajasekharan Chandrasekharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anakath M IjasInternal Medicine, Malabar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kozhikode, IND.
Gayathry RajasekharanPathology, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Thrissur, IND.
Chinthu Sara JacobInternal Medicine, Sree Uthradom Thirunal (SUT) Academy of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, IND.
Vijayakumar AnilInternal Medicine, Azeezia Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Kollam, IND.
Rajasekharan ChandrasekharanGeneral Medicine, Sree Uthradom Thirunal (SUT) Academy of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents a frequent and serious complication among patients requiring intensive care. This syndrome is a primary driver of elevated morbidity and mortality, while also leading to extended hospital stays and an increased susceptibility to future chronic kidney disease (CKD). Early identification of both risk factors and etiological factors is essential for timely intervention and improved clinical outcomes. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, demographic profiles, and etiological risk factors of critically ill patients presenting with AKI and compare the outcomes of patients with and without sepsis. Methods A longitudinal observational study was conducted in the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care hospital in Kerala between February 2021 and August 2022. A total of 77 adult patients diagnosed with AKI based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria were included in the study. Clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, etiologies, management strategies, and outcomes were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The overall mortality rate within the enrolled AKI cohort was 21 (27.3%). The majority of the patients were male (50, 64.9%) and over the age of 60 years (35, 45.4%). Community-acquired AKI (CAAKI) constituted 56 (72.7%) of the cases, while hospital-acquired AKI (HAAKI) accounted for 21 (27.2%) cases. Sepsis was identified as the leading cause of AKI at 26 (33.7%), followed by poisoning (13, 16.9%) and cardiac etiologies (14, 18.2%). Mortality was not significantly associated with age, gender, AKI type, or laboratory parameters, including hemoglobin levels or thrombocytopenia. However, mortality was significantly associated with metabolic acidosis (p=0.004), hyperbilirubinemia (p=0.037), and higher KDIGO stages (chi-square (χ²)=6.11, p=0.047). Among the 56 survivors, complete renal recovery was achieved in 47 patients (84.8%), partial recovery was observed in six patients (10.4%), and three patients (5.4%) remained dialysis-dependent at the follow-up period. Conclusion AKI remains a pervasive complication among the critically ill, where it continues to be linked with considerable fatality rates within the intensive care setting. Sepsis is the predominant etiology. Higher KDIGO stages, metabolic acidosis, and hyperbilirubinemia are significant predictors of poor outcomes. Early detection and prompt management of reversible factors may significantly improve survival rates.

Indexed as

acute kidney injurycommunity-acquired acute kidney injury (caaki)hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (haaki)intensive care unitkdigo criteriarenal replacement therapysepsis

Identifiers

PMID42403859
PMCPMC13333100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.