ArticleCureus2026
Anatomical Variation of Selected Cranial Emissary Foramina in Adult Greek Skulls: A Mixed Anatomical and Computed Tomography Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Cranial emissary foramina (CEF) are variable osseous channels that may transmit emissary veins (EVs) between extracranial venous networks and intracranial dural venous sinuses. Their anatomical relevance depends not only on their presence but also on laterality, size, morphology, and relationships with adjacent cranial landmarks. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, laterality, morphology, morphometry, and topographic anatomy of selected CEF in an adult Greek sample using a mixed anatomical and computed tomography (CT)-based design. Methods This retrospective observational study included 200 adult specimens, comprising 50 dry skulls (25.0%) and 150 CT examinations (75.0%). The parietal emissary foramina (PEF), sphenoidal emissary foramina (SEF), mastoid emissary foramina (MEF), and posterior condylar canal (PCC) were assessed for presence, laterality, morphology, morphometry, and topographic relationships. Side-to-side variation, co-occurrence patterns, and exploratory associations with selected constant cranial foramina, craniometric parameters, sex, and specimen type were also examined. Interobserver reliability was assessed for continuous measurements. Results The PCC was the most frequent structure, identified in 162 specimens (81.0%), followed by the MEF in 157 (78.5%), the PEF in 137 (68.5%), and the SEF in 49 (24.5%). Among specimens in which the corresponding foramen was present, bilateral expression was observed in 64 PEF cases (46.7%), 12 SEF cases (24.5%), 74 MEF cases (47.1%), and 73 PCC cases (45.1%). The SEF showed the highest proportion of unilateral cases, with unilateral expression in 37 cases (75.5%). Morphologic classification showed a predominance of oval forms across the examined foramina. Morphometric profiles differed by anatomical region, with the SEF exhibiting the smallest dimensions and the PCC the largest. Topographic measurements demonstrated distinct regional relationships for each foramen. Co-occurrence analysis identified a selective association between the presence of SEF and PCC. Exploratory regression analyses demonstrated selective associations with skull base length, adjacent foraminal dimensions, cranial breadth, and sex. Interobserver reliability was high to excellent. Conclusions CEF were frequent but anatomically heterogeneous structures in this adult Greek sample. Their assessment should be region-specific and should integrate prevalence, laterality, morphometry, morphology, and topographic anatomy. The observed exploratory associations require confirmation in independent anatomical and imaging studies incorporating vascular imaging techniques to distinguish osseous foramina from functionally relevant EV pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.