Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403809›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Geographic Variation in Botulinum Toxin Type A Longevity: A Pilot Comparative Study Between Saint Petersburg and Ashgabat.

Zuleyha Allambergenova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zuleyha AllambergenovaDermatology and Aesthetic Medicine, Kosmet_A Clinic, Saint Petersburg, RUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical duration of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is commonly associated with anatomical factors, yet environmental influences remain an area of clinical interest. This observation, based on clinical practice in Saint Petersburg and Ashgabat, explores potential variations in neuromodulator requirements across different climatic zones. It has been hypothesized that chronic solar exposure may be associated with differences in facial muscle engagement and aesthetic treatment outcomes; however, this relationship was not directly evaluated in the present study. The purpose of this pilot investigation was to explore whether differences in BoNT-A dosage requirements and treatment longevity could be observed between two geographic cohorts residing in regions with different climatic and ultraviolet (UV) environments. Some patients underwent platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy or biorevitalization as part of routine clinical practice prior to BoNT-A administration. However, the present study was not designed to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. These observations are intended to highlight the need for further investigation of potential climate-related factors influencing aesthetic treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

aesthetic medicine clinica pilot studybotulinum toxin type adermal photoagingultraviolet exposureultraviolet radiation exposure

Identifiers

PMID42403809
PMCPMC13333075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.