ReviewCureus2026
Social Determinants of Emergency Department Utilization, Overuse, and Access Barriers Among Adults: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency departments (EDs) are facing increasing adult demand, and socially driven patterns of repeated, avoidable, or nonurgent use remain insufficiently synthesized across healthcare settings. ED utilization is influenced not only by clinical need but also by broader social and structural conditions that shape access to healthcare. This systematic review examined the social determinants associated with ED utilization, overuse, repeated attendance, and access barriers among adults. A structured search of major biomedical and health services databases was conducted, and eligible studies were reviewed using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Because of variation across study designs, populations, and outcome definitions, findings were synthesized narratively. The review found that ED use was consistently associated with socioeconomic disadvantage, unmet social needs, poor access to timely primary care, weak social support, neighborhood deprivation, and broader health system barriers. Common drivers included low income, food insecurity, public insurance dependence, unstable housing, limited continuity of care, transportation difficulties, and restricted availability of alternative services. Across settings, repeated or nonurgent ED use often appeared to reflect unmet need and constrained access rather than simple inappropriate use. These findings suggest that socially driven ED utilization should be understood as a health equity issue requiring more responsive primary care, stronger social support pathways, and better integration between emergency services and community-based care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.