ArticleCureus2026
Significance of Gastrointestinal Histiocytosis: A Case Series and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims Gastrointestinal (GI) histiocytosis is an uncommon and heterogeneous finding that may represent reactive, infectious, medication-related, or neoplastic processes. Because lesions are often identified incidentally on biopsy, their true frequency, etiologic spectrum, and optimal diagnostic approach remain poorly defined. We aimed to characterize GI histiocytosis using a large institutional cohort and contextualize findings using a review of published adult cases. Methods We performed a retrospective case series of adult patients at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation with histiocytic involvement of the GI tract identified on pathology specimens between 2007 and 2022, along with a systematic review of adult cases published on PubMed from 2002 to 2022. Extracted data included demographics, presenting symptoms, indications for endoscopy, anatomic distribution, endoscopic findings, associated conditions, and available immunohistochemical and molecular results. Results The institutional cohort included 108 patients (mean age 63.7 years; 60.2% female), of whom 35% were asymptomatic. Involvement spanned the esophagus to rectum, most commonly affecting the stomach. Endoscopic findings ranged from normal mucosa to polyps, nodules, and ulcerations. Nearly half of cases lacked definitive etiologic classification. Conclusions GI histiocytosis may be more common than previously appreciated but frequently remains incompletely evaluated in routine clinical practice. Integrating clinical context with targeted histologic assessment and selective molecular testing may help distinguish incidental reactive findings from clinically significant histiocytic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.