Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403778›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Timing, Surgical Techniques, and Functional Outcomes in Primary Cleft Palate Repair: A Focused Review of Clinical Evidence.

Geomara N Guerron-Cuenca, Glen A Silva-Rojas, Galo G Farfán-Cano, Kevin J Silva-Rojas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Geomara N Guerron-CuencaSchool of Medicine, Catholic University of Santiago of Guayaquil, Guayaquil, ECU.
Glen A Silva-RojasResearch, FarCan, SilRoj et Al. Research Group, Guayaquil, ECU.
Galo G Farfán-CanoResearch, FarCan, SilRoj et Al. Research Group, Guayaquil, ECU.
Kevin J Silva-RojasSchool of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Santiago of Guayaquil, Guayaquil, ECU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A structured literature review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using predefined search terms related to cleft palate, palatoplasty, timing, and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). The aim was to evaluate the impact of surgical timing and operative techniques on functional outcomes following primary cleft palate repair, with a focus on velopharyngeal function. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies reporting speech-related outcomes were included. Considerable heterogeneity was identified in surgical timing, techniques, and outcome definitions. Most observational studies did not show a statistically significant association between timing and speech outcomes. Anatomical factors, particularly cleft width and subtype, demonstrated a stronger correlation with postoperative outcomes. Current evidence does not support a universally optimal timing for primary palatal repair. Functional outcomes appear to be influenced by multiple factors beyond timing, including surgical technique and patient-specific characteristics. Standardized outcome measures and multicenter studies are needed to improve comparability and guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

cleft palatepalatoplastyspeech outcomessurgical timingvelopharyngeal insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID42403778
PMCPMC13333139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.