ReviewCureus2026
Timing, Surgical Techniques, and Functional Outcomes in Primary Cleft Palate Repair: A Focused Review of Clinical Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A structured literature review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using predefined search terms related to cleft palate, palatoplasty, timing, and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). The aim was to evaluate the impact of surgical timing and operative techniques on functional outcomes following primary cleft palate repair, with a focus on velopharyngeal function. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies reporting speech-related outcomes were included. Considerable heterogeneity was identified in surgical timing, techniques, and outcome definitions. Most observational studies did not show a statistically significant association between timing and speech outcomes. Anatomical factors, particularly cleft width and subtype, demonstrated a stronger correlation with postoperative outcomes. Current evidence does not support a universally optimal timing for primary palatal repair. Functional outcomes appear to be influenced by multiple factors beyond timing, including surgical technique and patient-specific characteristics. Standardized outcome measures and multicenter studies are needed to improve comparability and guide clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.