ReviewCureus2026
Operative Exposure, Mentorship, and Gender: A Narrative Review of the Determinants of Subspecialty Fellowship Pursuit in Orthopedic Surgery Residents.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fellowship training has become a near-universal component of orthopedic surgical education, yet the factors driving residents toward specific subspecialties remain incompletely characterized. Identifying these determinants is essential for residency program directors, fellowship training programs, and professional societies seeking to optimize workforce development and address persistent disparities in subspecialty representation. A comprehensive narrative review of 75 peer-reviewed studies was conducted using systematic searches of PubMed, Google Scholar, and SciSpace. Quantitative survey data, national fellowship match statistics, and qualitative findings were synthesized to characterize factors influencing fellowship selection across five major orthopedic subspecialties: sports medicine, spine surgery, arthroplasty (adult reconstruction), pediatric orthopedics, and trauma. Fellowship selection is a multifaceted decision driven by intrinsic motivation, operative exposure in residency, mentorship relationships, and practical considerations that vary substantially across subspecialties. Sports medicine applicants prioritize clinical outcomes, personal interest, and operative variety. Arthroplasty candidates emphasize intellectual challenge and mentorship quality, whereas pursuit of a spine fellowship shows the strongest correlation with operative volume during residency (108.4 ± 50.7 vs. 74.4 ± 60.2 cases, p < 0.01). Pediatric orthopedics attracts the highest proportion of female applicants at 25% and is distinguished by program directors' emphasis on interview performance and letters of recommendation. Significant gender disparities persist, with female representation ranging from 3% in spine to 25% in pediatrics against an overall mean of 11%. Quantitative trauma-specific selection data remain limited in the published literature. Personal interest and subspecialty passion are universal drivers in fellowship selection, while operative volume, mentorship quality, intellectual challenge, and financial considerations shape distinctive applicant profiles across subspecialties. The more-than-eightfold variation in female representation across fellowships suggests the need for targeted mentorship initiatives, culture assessments, and increased visibility of role models, particularly in spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.