ArticleCureus2026
Imeglimin as a Replacement Therapy for Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Experiencing Metformin Intolerance: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major global health burden. Despite being the preferred first-line therapy, metformin use is sometimes limited by gastrointestinal intolerance, creating a need for alternative management strategies. A promising oral antidiabetic substitute, imeglimin, a first-in-class tetrahydrotriazine, has a distinct mitochondrial mechanism of action. However, its real-world efficacy and tolerability as a direct replacement for metformin in GI-intolerant patients remain uncharacterized. Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted on 100 adult patients with T2DM who had documented metformin intolerance and were initiated on imeglimin monotherapy or combination therapy for three months. Primary outcomes included variations in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG). Body weight, lipid profile, and renal function were the secondary outcomes. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test; paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were applied as appropriate. Multivariate linear regression was performed with change in HbA1c as the dependent variable and key covariates (baseline HbA1c, age, sex, T2DM duration, body weight, imeglimin dose, and number of concomitant oral anti-diabetic drugs) as independent variables. A two-tailed p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study comprised 100 patients (55% female; mean age: 57.69 ± 9.24 years; mean T2DM duration: 10.38 ± 5.69 years). HbA1c decreased significantly from 7.96 ± 1.56% to 7.35 ± 1.02% (mean change: -0.62 ± 1.05%; p<0.001; n=77) after three months of imeglimin therapy. FPG decreased from 156.63 ± 48.48 mg/dL to 124.45 ± 20.46 mg/dL (-32.18 ± 47.02 mg/dL; p<0.001), and PPG decreased from 217.85 ± 84.08 mg/dL to 173.22 ± 39.71 mg/dL (-44.63 ± 68.44 mg/dL; p<0.001). Body weight decreased significantly (-0.81 kg; p<0.001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels also showed significant reductions (p<0.001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable (p=0.135), and gastrointestinal side effects were reported in only 2% of the patients. Conclusion Imeglimin demonstrated meaningful improvements in glycemic control, with a favorable safety and tolerability profile in metformin-intolerant patients with T2DM. These findings support the use of imeglimin as an effective and well-tolerated alternative option for metformin in patients with T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.