ArticleCureus2026
Occupational Accidents Caused by Sharp Objects Among Healthcare Workers and Medical Students: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to retrospectively evaluate sharp object injuries (SOIs) among healthcare workers (HCWs) and medical students in a 10-year period, from 2014 to 2023. A secondary aim was to assess the procedures and the prevalence of exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
methodsThe data collection was retrieved from the hospital records for the examined period. All laboratory parameters had been determined by the electrochemiluminescence method and were performed using the Alinity instrument (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA). Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 30.0.
resultsIn total, 771 occupational accidents occurred, involving individuals with an average age of 34 years. Blood sampling was the most common procedure (n=360; 46.7%). Regarding the source, 61 (7.9%) cases involved abandoned sharps, while in 710 (92.1%) cases the source patient was identified. Laboratory analysis of the identified source patients showed that 31 (4.4%) were HBsAg-positive, 25 (3.5%) were anti-HCV positive only, 4 (0.6%) were HIV I/II positive, and 8 (1.1%) had screening tests for
conclusionsThis retrospective observational study underscores the persistent clinical risk of SOIs among HCWs and medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.