ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Real-world pharmacovigilance of drug-related bone metabolism disorders: integrating FAERS and VigiAccess with a Bradford Hill-based causal plausibility assessment.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic bone diseases (MBDs) are a group of conditions characterized by imbalanced bone remodeling, including osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and rickets. In recent years, drug-induced secondary MBDs have emerged as a major clinical concern. However, systematic drug risk assessment studies based on large-scale real-world data remain scarce. Methods: Based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS, 2004-2024) and VigiAccess, four complementary disproportionality algorithms (reporting odds ratio, ROR; proportional reporting ratio, PRR; Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, BCPNN; multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker, MGPS) were used to screen drug-event signals. The signals were stratified by gender and age type, and their temporal distribution characteristics were characterized using the Weibull model. Finally, the causal plausibility was assessed using the updated Bradford Hill framework. Results: A total of 55,783 adverse event reports were included, and 33 drugs showed consistent positive signals in both the FAERS and VigiAccess databases. Major signal drugs included bisphosphonates (e.g., alendronic acid, zoledronic acid), antiviral drugs (e.g., tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine/tenofovir combination), proton pump inhibitors (e.g., esomeprazole), and endocrine antineoplastic drugs (e.g., anastrozole). Within the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification, signals were primarily concentrated in anti-infectives (category J), antineoplastic and immunomodulatory drugs (category L), and musculoskeletal drugs (category M). Conclusion: This study systematically identified robust pharmacovigilance signals and disproportionality-based associations between multiple drug classes and metabolic bone disorders through an integrated analysis of the FAERS and VigiAccess databases, providing high-confidence real-world evidence for pharmacovigilance signal detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.