ArticleBMJ public health2026
Relation between socio-economic deprivation and chronic pain-related burden: a cross-sectional evaluation in a secondary care pain rehabilitation clinic.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deprivation is an established risk factor for the presence of chronic pain. Less is known about the relation between deprivation and the impact of chronic pain on functioning. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in functioning across people with chronic pain based on deprivation and evaluate if the risk of clinically significant disruption increases proportionally with greater deprivation. Methods: These issues were examined in a cross-sectional analysis of 491 treatment-seeking individuals with chronic pain. Participants completed measures of pain interference, social functioning, depression, anxiety, physical function, sleep disturbance, cognitive functioning, fatigue intensity and pain intensity. Deprivation was quantified using the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure, which rank orders all postcodes in the province across seven domains. Three deprivation categories were derived (low, middle and high), which were used to evaluate sample differences in pain-related functioning. Results: Significant between-group differences were indicated across all measures with the lowest deprivation group reporting higher functioning in relation to the other two groups across most measures. The only exceptions were for depression and anxiety which increased significantly across each level of deprivation. A similar pattern was found when examining clinically significant scores, particularly for social functioning, depression and anxiety. Conclusion: Deprivation is more than a risk factor for chronic pain. Deprivation is a risk factor for more distressing, disabling and disruptive chronic pain. These findings indicate that redirection of clinical efforts is warranted to allow interventions to more adequately address the complexities of those seeking treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.