ArticleBMJ public health2026
Association of municipal rurality and area deprivation with cause-specific mortality in Japan: a nationwide ecological study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychiatric standardized claim ratios by rurality and deprivation in Japan: A nationwide ecological study with contextual suicide mortality.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rural-urban disparities in mortality persist across high-income countries but whether these differences reflect geographic barriers, socioeconomic disadvantage or both remains unclear. Disentangling these pathways is important for designing effective interventions but nationwide Japanese evidence that jointly models geographic remoteness and area deprivation in relation to cause-specific mortality remains limited. Methods: This municipality-level ecological study analysed 4 078 801 deaths during 2017-2019 across 1890 municipalities in Japan. Rurality was measured using the Rurality Index for Japan, and socioeconomic deprivation using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Bayesian spatial Poisson models estimated rate ratios (RRs) for all-cause mortality and 34 cause-specific outcomes (35 outcomes in total) with and without ADI adjustment. Percentage attenuation was interpreted descriptively. Results: After ADI adjustment, rural excess persisted for all-cause mortality overall (adjusted RR 1.010 (95% credible interval (CrI) 1.003 to 1.016)) and in females (1.009 (95% CrI 1.002 to 1.016), while the male estimate was close to the null. Rural excess also persisted for selected cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes in the total population, including heart diseases, acute myocardial infarction, arrhythmias and conduction disorders, heart failure, cerebrovascular diseases and cerebral infarction (RRs 1.023-1.052), plus senility, unintentional injuries, traffic accidents and suicide. Aggregate malignant neoplasms, which overlapped with site-specific cancers, were near null in the total population, whereas tuberculosis, pneumonia, several site-specific cancers, asthma and liver disease showed urban excess, most notably tuberculosis (0.858 (95% CrI 0.814 to 0.905)). Conclusions: Municipal rurality showed heterogeneous cause-specific associations with mortality after ADI adjustment. Higher rurality was associated with excess mortality for several time-sensitive or access-sensitive causes whereas infectious, respiratory, liver and site-specific cancer outcomes showed urban excess. Because the ecological design precludes causal inference about specific pathways reducing disparities requires cause-specific strategies addressing geographic access, socioeconomic disadvantage and urban-context risks, rather than uniform rural-urban policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.