ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The multidimensional inventory of religious/spiritual wellbeing in Hungarian language: psychometric properties and initial validation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research increasingly highlights the relationship between religiosity/spirituality, mental health and wellbeing. Our study presents the psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the multidimensional inventory of religious/spiritual wellbeing (MI-RSWB) and examines its correlations with the spiritual wellbeing scale (SWBS) and the Brief Multidimensional Measurement of Religiosity Scale (BMMRS). Methods: Data were collected from 490 Hungarian participants (347 female; aged 18 and older) through an online survey. The survey included the newly translated Hungarian version of MI-RSWB, SWBS, and BMMRS. Results: Four models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). While the 48-item version did not achieve adequate fit indicators, the 18-item abbreviated version showed acceptable fit across the tested models. The six-factor model of the Hungarian MI-RSWB demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, in both the 48-item (α = 0.77-0.97) and 18-item (α = 0.74-0.95) versions. Discussion: The findings indicate that the Hungarian MI-RSWB has satisfying convergent and content validity and reliability. Based on the CFA results, the 18-item version is recommended for future use and research where brevity and model fit are prioritized, while the 48-item version remains useful for broader content coverage. Further validation studies are needed to assess the Hungarian 18-item MI-RSWB in both clinical and nonclinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.