Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403583›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Understanding the implementation, impact and sustainability of Bristol's unhealthy commodity advertising restrictions policy: a qualitative systems-based study of stakeholder perspectives.

Sarah K Harding, James Nobles, Jeremy Horwood, Rowan Brockman, Genevieve Buckland, Zoi Toumpakari, Agnes Nairn, Sarah Blake, Steven Cummins, Russell Jago and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sarah K HardingApplied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-6307
James NoblesSchool of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Jeremy HorwoodApplied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7092-4960
Rowan BrockmanApplied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Genevieve BucklandCentre for Public Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-6598
Zoi ToumpakariCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Agnes NairnBristol Hub for Gambling Harms Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sarah BlakeCentre for Research in Health and Social Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Steven CumminsPopulation Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Russell JagoApplied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Carlos Sillero RejonApplied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Frank de VochtApplied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In 2021, Bristol became the first English local authority (LA) outside London to introduce restrictions on advertisements for high fat, salt and sugar products and other unhealthy commodities (alcohol, gambling and payday loans) on LA outdoor advertising sites (bus shelters and some billboards). This study aimed to explore the policy's acceptability, implementation barriers and facilitators, perceived impacts and considerations for sustaining and wider roll out of the policy. Methods: 22 online semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders from Bristol-City-Council (n=12), advertising industries (n=3), third-sector advertising and sustainability organisations (n=5) and the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (n=2). Interview transcripts were analysed using inductive and deductive thematic analyses. Results: Stakeholders acknowledged the importance of this policy as part of a system-wide approach to decrease consumption and use of unhealthy commodities. However, several barriers to behaviour change were recognised: (1) limited scope for change of outdoor advertising exposure, (2) displacment of adverts for unhealthy comodities and (3) adaptations to advertising copy. To sustain the policy, stakeholders highlighted the need for a formal auditing process and continued reviewing and improving of the policy in response to industry adaptations as well as expanding the policy to include private advertising spaces. Conclusion: While the policy was seen as a valuable step towards reducing use and consumption of unhealthy commodities, its impact on behaviour may be limited due to the LA owning relatively little outdoor advertising space and by industry adaptations to enable advertising of unhealthy commodities to continue.

Indexed as

ObesityPublic HealthQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42403583
PMCPMC13330893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.