Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403573›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2026

Quality of Life in Patients following distal nerve transfers for the Restoration of Shoulder abduction and external rotation - Single centre experience.

Andrija Savić, Jovan Grujić, Aleksandar Djurdjević, Svetozar Stanković, Aleksa Mićić, Aleksandra Stojiljković, Dragoslav Nestorović, Milan Lepić, Nenad Novaković, Lukas Rasulić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrija SavićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jovan GrujićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandar DjurdjevićMedical Faculty, Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia.
Svetozar StankovićMedical Faculty, Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksa MićićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra StojiljkovićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dragoslav NestorovićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milan LepićMedical Faculty, Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nenad NovakovićMedical Faculty, Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia.
Lukas RasulićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Restoration of shoulder function is a key objective in brachial plexus surgery, as impaired abduction and external rotation substantially limit upper limb use and quality of life. Distal nerve transfers offer shorter regeneration distances and more predictable outcomes than nerve grafting. Research question: This study evaluated the effectiveness of distal nerve transfers in restoring shoulder function, reducing pain, and improving quality of life in patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Material and methods: A prospective cohort of 36 patients with traumatic brachial plexus or axillary nerve lesions was treated using spinal accessory to suprascapular and/or radial-to-axillary nerve transfers via a posterior approach. Outcomes were assessed two years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving M3-M5 shoulder abduction. Secondary outcomes included external rotation, pain, stability, and the Peripheral Nerve Surgery Quality of Life (PNSQoL) score. Functional recovery was graded using the M0-M5 scale, with M3-M5 considered satisfactory. Results: Satisfactory shoulder abduction was achieved in 91.9% of patients, and satisfactory external rotation in 78.4%. Preoperatively, most patients were classified as having poor or fair PNSQoL, whereas postoperatively the majority shifted to good, very good, or excellent categories. Lesion type significantly influenced external rotation outcomes, with complete brachial plexus palsy showing the poorest results. Younger age and earlier surgery (<6 months) showed trends toward better recovery. Discussion and conclusion: Distal nerve transfers are effective and reproducible procedures for restoring shoulder function, reducing pain, and improving quality of life in patients with brachial plexus injuries.

Indexed as

Brachial plexusNerve transferShoulder function

Identifiers

PMID42403573
PMCPMC13329389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.