ArticleBrain & spine2026
Learning curve in full-endoscopic lumbar surgery for disc herniation in a spine clinic in Mexico: Comparative analysis of IELD and TELD techniques.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common condition that can be treated with full-endoscopic surgery (FES). Publications suggest that the learning curve is steep. There are no reports from Latin America. Objective: To evaluate the learning curve for FES in LDH and compare outcomes between full-endoscopic interlaminar approach (IELD) and full-endoscopic transforaminal approach (TELD) in Mexico. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 114 consecutive patients (68 IELD, 46 TELD) was analyzed. Learning curves were modeled using segmented linear regression and Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis to identify transition points in operative time. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg/back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months follow-up. Ridge-penalized logistic regression was used to identify predictors of prolonged surgery. Results: Technique-specific breakpoints were observed at case 18 for IELD and case 20 for TELD, while the overall learning curve was at 44 cases. The median operative time significantly decreased from the early to late phase (IELD: 120 to 60 min; TELD: 90 to 60 min). Clinical success (≥30% improvement) was achieved by over 76% of patients across all metrics. There were no significant differences in complication and conversion rates between the learning phases. Discussion & conclusions: Proficiency in FES for LDH was reached after approximately 20 cases per technique. Surgeon experience may influence this learning curve. Both methods yield excellent clinical outcomes. FES is effective, safe, and reproducible in Latin America.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.