ArticleBrain & spine2026
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The recovery of hand function following nerve surgeries is an important aspect of rehabilitation significantly influencing patients' quality of life. Sensory and motor deficits of the hand can impair grasping ability and fine motor skills. In our previous study it could be proved that intense and targeted training can help quicker rehabilitation of these functions.This project has the aim to develop a mobile application designed to facilitate hand function training post-nerve surgery. The application incorporates evidence-based exercises and progress tracking to enhance patient engagement. Material/methods: The App was developed using Flutterflow as the front-end framework and Firebased as the back-end. Data security was ensured throughout the development process. A total of 21 exercise videos were integrated. The app was compared to other existing rehabilitation apps in terms of user-friendliness and content. It was also evaluated qualitatively by different participants. Results: The results indicate that the app is competitive in terms of user-friendliness and functionality; however, there is potential for further optimization, particularly in the customization of treatment plans and in fostering long-term user motivation. Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.